The Benchmark

Most chief executives are invisible online. Whether that is a problem for you is a different question.

Six questions show you where you stand next to your peers. Answered from memory, result on screen right away.

What is compared

6 questionsabout 4 minutesComparison on screen right awayNo sales call

The starting point

Why this comparison is already running

In our own first calls, the same picture repeats: most executives have a dead profile or none at all, while a visible few are known across their market.

Before anyone calls you, offers you a mandate, or applies to work with you, they usually look you up first. In that moment you get compared with visible peers, whether you want it or not. Whoever checks your name has checked others before, and some of them were easy to find.

The habit itself is documented: in the Brunswick study “Connected Leadership” (2022, n=6,400), 82 % of employees research a CEO’s online presence when considering joining. From our own practice we can add: most chief executives we meet have no working presence of their own. The visible few are exactly that, few. That is why a comparison is worth four minutes.

82 % of employees research a CEO’s online presence when considering joining Brunswick study “Connected Leadership” 2022, n=6,400

The evidence

What changes when someone switches sides

Sarah Gäbler holds a leadership role at Bridge imp, HR and interim management. Her profile sat unused, like most. Four months later, the right people knew her name, and her numbers have been above the reference values since.

1,000 → 3,700 Followers in four months (+270%)
17% Engagement rate (benchmark: 2–5%)
28% Comment rate (benchmark: 5–10%)

“The conversations always start with an advance of trust. As if people have known me forever. Even though it’s the first exchange.”

Sarah Gäbler · Bridge imp

Your comparison includes

The check does not grade your work.

It shows where you stand: compared with what your peers make publicly visible.

  1. Where you stand in three areas

  2. The typical peer as your reference

  3. What the visible few do differently

  4. The one step that moves the most

  5. “Not now” is an allowed result

The few

The visible few are exactly that, few.

From the mandates

What changes for them

“It has to have real value. For readers, and for me.”
Antje Lenk
Antje Lenk Interim Management · Bridge imp

6,000 → 23,000 followers

Read the case →
“On the very first video call, prospects bring up my LinkedIn posts.”
Dieter Leikermoser
Dieter Leikermoser Mechanical engineering · Mey Maschinenbau

70 → 900 profile visitors / week

Read the case →
“For you, it's simply not an option that this doesn't work, is it?”
Michel Karaenke
Michel Karaenke IT Interim Management · DACH

534,919 impressions in 3 months

Read the case →

See all cases →

The method

Six questions, three dimensions, one comparison

The comparison asks in the order visibility is built: Does your profile exist? Do you post regularly? Does the market respond? You answer from memory, there is nothing to look up.

  1. Presence 2 questions

    Do you exist as a person: an account of your own, a profile that fits your role? For reference: most executives we meet start without one.

  2. Activity 2 questions

    Does a post of your own appear regularly, or does only the company page post? For reference: the visible few post steadily under their own name.

  3. Resonance 2 questions

    Do people respond to your posts, and do conversations start with them? For reference: where nothing appears under your name, there is nothing to respond to.

6 questions · about 4 minutes · no sales call